Skip to content

AFM · Metrology

More measurements. The same uncertainty floor.

Separate independent read noise from shared calibration error before trusting a smaller error bar.

Standard uncertainty

8 reference readings0.3068nm
128 reference readings0.3024nm
Difference −0.0044nm
Values & comparison details

Difference = comparison − reference. Rounded for display; original data retained.

8 reference readings
0.30678799182888106 nm
128 reference readings
0.30237279060069183 nm

Same shared-error model. Uncertainty of one profile mean; synthetic study.

Original synthetic numerical study · No measured data
01Reference readings
02Shared error model
03Uncertainty & coverage
More measurements. The same uncertainty floor. Separate independent read noise from shared calibration error before trusting a smaller error bar.Open full figure
Original synthetic numerical study · No measured data

THE QUESTION

Can repeated reference readings remove uncertainty in the mean absolute height of one AFM profile?

THE APPROACH

A fixed synthetic measurement model is evaluated with eight reference positions and 1, 4 or 16 readings per position. The same 512 trial estimates are assessed using a shared-error covariance model and an intentionally incorrect independence assumption.

WHAT THE COMPARISON SHOWS

Three things to take away.

  1. 01

    Increasing the total from 8 to 128 readings lowers the correctly propagated standard uncertainty only from 0.3068 to 0.3024 nm. The fixed model has a 0.3021 nm limiting floor.

  2. 02

    Treating the shared calibration error as independent suggests 0.0463 nm at 128 readings. Repetition has not created that information.

  3. 03

    Across the same 512 synthetic trials, the nominal 95% intervals cover the true mean in 94.53% of trials with the shared-error model and 23.24% with the incorrect model.

Evidence, assumptions & the next question

What was numerically checked

Independent augmented-QR and algebraic controls, uncertainty reconstruction, paired synthetic trials and replay checks support the bounded numerical comparison.

How far the result goes

Synthetic measurement model. The quantity is uncertainty in one profile’s mean absolute height, not pixel RMSE or the uncertainty of a Monte Carlo grand mean. This is not an AFM instrument calibration.

What a physical study would need next

A real application needs reference calibration, drift and covariance information, native readings and a clearly defined measurand.

SA-MET-VARIABILITY-UQ-068 · AFM reference-zero uncertainty · 2026-09-30

The download contains selected plot data, captions and a redraw script. Source records and hashes keep the public figures traceable to the completed study.

RESEARCH SUPPORT · FIGURES · MANUSCRIPTS

Bring your question. Build the full story.

We can help organize your literature and numerical results, build scientific diagrams and figure sets, develop original cover concepts, and refine the manuscript around them.